Splitting television receptions

Source: bescenta
 

A consortium of European researchers is seeking develop a better reception for digital television in the worst reception environments. The team have found that by splitting the transmit power between many antennas they can deliver the most effective coverage.

Scrabble Word Finder

A consortium of European researchers are seeking to develop a better reception for digital television in the worst environments. The team have found that by splitting the transmit power between many antennas they can deliver the most effective coverage.
 
This discovery could reduce the network infrastructure needed for mobile TV whilst simplifying the mobile TV receivers of the future.
 
Today’s broadcast transmissions function through radio signals that bounce off objects in their environment reaching their destination receiver over multiple paths. Any distortion experienced by the multi-path signals will result in the temporary lapse of the television’s reception.
 
A modulation scheme called Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing (OFDM), used in wireless broadband technologies, such as DAB audio, is now being used by the European consortium as an effective method for maintaining a clear TV reception.
 
The Physical Layer DVB Transmission Optimisation (PLUTO) project has developed a splitting technique dubbed ‘transmit diversity.’ The technique has been tested to benefit the worst reception environments and improve reception during activities such as driving or walking.
 
“This technique does not require revision of any WiMAX, DVB or DAB standards,” explained Maurice Bard of  UK company Broadreach Systems, the technical leader of PLUTO. “The great advantage is that it can be exploited by existing in-service receivers without modification. All you need is an additional box that can split the signal.”
 
“The transmit antennas need to be spatially separated by between 10 and 20 wavelengths and a delay applied to one antenna to achieve effective de-correlation. The amount of separation and delay depends on the type of environment to be covered,” Bard added.
 
Fewer transmitters and less power are required to achieve economical coverage.
 
“This technique does not require revision of any WiMAX, DVB or DAB standards,” says Maurice Bard of UK company Broadreach Systems, the technical leader of PLUTO. “The great advantage is that it can be exploited by existing in-service receivers without modification. All you need is an additional box that can split the signal.”
 
“The transmit antennas need to be spatially separated by between 10 and 20 wavelengths and a delay applied to one antenna to achieve effective de-correlation. The amount of separation and delay depends on the type of environment to be covered,” says Bard.
 
Coverage can be further improved if there are two or more antennas at the reception end, he explains: “For receive diversity, you need to separate the receive antennas by at least half a wavelength which is approximately 25 centimetres at UHF frequencies. If this can be achieved, then transmit and receive diversity can work together to deliver even greater benefits. The benefits of receive diversity, however, can only be exploited in terms of network design if all receivers in the network have diversity implemented.”

Filling in black holes

Even with the reception improvements promised by transmit diversity, there will be reception black spots, particularly indoors, where on-channel repeaters will be needed. An on-channel repeater receives a signal from a distant transmitter and re-transmits it at the same frequency. The repeaters are prone to instability caused by the feedback of echoes from the transmitter to the receiver. Here, the academics at Brunel University, led by PLUTO project coordinator Professor John Cosmas, have developed an innovative method to remove these echoes.
 
A pseudo-random sequence is buried deep in the re-transmitted DVB-H signal,” explains Cosmas. “The sequence acts as a signature, allowing the repeater to differentiate the unwanted echoes from the wanted original signal and remove them from the re-transmission.”
 
“The method can work for repeaters of any OFDM based network.”
 
Broadreach Systems has provided equipment to process signals at the transmitter and monitoring stations that intercept and measure transmitted DVB signals. The monitor stations are networked to a control centre, developed by Brunel, enabling the effects of diversity to be evaluated in real time.”
 
There are still some hurdles to be overcome before PLUTO’s transmit diversity solution is suitable for all types of broadcast networks. Transmit diversity actually results in a degradation in reception where the receiver is in clear line-of-sight with the transmitter and the signals from each antenna are received at exactly the same power level.
 
The line-of-sight reception loss may not prove to be a problem for many networks. In a mobile TV network, all receivers will be in a non- or near- line-of-sight situation, very few will have rooftop antennas. But ‘good enough’ is not a position that the PLUTO consortium is prepared to stop at if they are to change traditional thinking.
 
“We need to show that the performance we saw in the lab can be achieved in all real situations, rain, snow, cities …” says Cosmas.
 
“And, we have to convince the broadcasters who designed traditional analogue networks, where multi-paths had to be avoided, that multi-paths are good.”

You’ve read it. Now review it.

Source: bescenta
Date Published: January 03, 2008
 
Useful? Recommend It.

If you found this item fun or informative, please let others know. Simply send to a friend or recommend it to even more people - on any of the following sites:

Latest Science News | reddit | digg.com | del.icio.us | rollyo | stumbleupon

More on broadcast signals...

Hairy filters
Mobile phone can receive clearer signals with new electronic filter.

SNIFF your friends
New application can locate friends using mobile phone signals.

Health symptoms not linked to mast emissions
One of the largest studies into the short-term health effects of mobile phone technology has found that phone masts do not cause symptoms.